Unity... but to what extent?
I remember the summer before i started 8th grade i went to "Broadway at Baker" theater camp where i was known for being a Christian. My roommate asked what denomination i was, and i told him i didn't have one. He wasn't a Christian but was thoroughly convinced that there was no such thing as a non-denominational Christian. I remember him saying "I don't care what you say. EVERY Christian church is part of some denomination!" It raised some doubts in me about whether i really wasn't part of a denomination.
Now, i can clearly see that there are many non-denominational churches out there, but isn't it interesting that so many have to put a denominational name in front?
Digging a little deeper, i would say that most Christians would give lip-service to the idea that we all should be united, but when pressed, maybe they/we don't really feel that way. Would I want to have a church where half of the congregation believed you need to be baptized in order to be saved? Would i want some of the pastors believing that salvation can be lost while the others believe that once you're saved, you're always saved?
There are some issues which are not crucial enough to divide Christians from non-Christians, but maybe are enough to divide one church from another. After all, everyone can go to whatever church he/she wants to (no reason to think all the Christians in Olathe need to show up at the same building). Why not allow people also to attend church where they get a unified message from all of the pastors and most of the congregation, without having to tiptoe around hundreds of individuals' interpretations on non-essential doctrine?
Jeremy
Home
J & C
Angel
Tony
Family
Blog